BLOG

Group Buying gone mad!

Some time back I blogged about GroupOn, the Chicago-based Group Buying phenomenon. Since then they have continued their astonishing pace of growth and are now available in over 100 cities including 10’s of locations outside of the US (all in 15 or so months from launch!). GroupOn’s growth is somewhat propelled by their early mover advantage which has afforded them a large amount of mainstream consumer press in the US, driving awareness of the segment and brand (all that’s required to acquire users) while they gathered cash to drive acquisitions that further accelerate their growth cycle and defend the space. The simplicity of the Group Buying model helps too, as does GroupOn’s excellence in execution. Much like Google the segment they dominate has now become synonymous with their brand in the US at least – something GroupOn’s competitors’ may find is impossibly hard to shake.

Ironically, Group Buying is a very easy segment to enter, it’s a a strong cash business that you can start with a basic transactional website and a couple of sales people, in Australia this has played out and there are already ten or more GroupOn pretenders live and running in only 5 or 6 months. Today’s winners in Australia started with a reasonably large base of consumers they could send offers to from sister businesses (www.scoopon.com.au from www.catchoftheday.com.au ) or smart Facebook  feeder strategies (www.jumponit.com.au from www.facebook.com/sydneydeals ) offering them clear differentiation from the smaller competitors.

Another similarity to Search and a challenge the also-ran Group Buying businesses face is the lack of Switching Cost, meaning that Consumers are able to jump between providers with little or no personal cost, switching “loyalty” at the click of an Unsubscribe link. Chances are a number of poorly funded Group Buying pretenders will come and go over the coming months, it will no doubt be fascinating to watch!

Google still thinking about search, apparently!

English: The relationship and evolution in Int...
English: The relationship and evolution in Internet Search Business (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I was struck by how seldom I hear of Google’s search endeavours when I read about the recent release of their updated Search Algorithm, codenamed Caffeine. Given Paid Search accounts for 96% of G’s revenues you’d think it would be the focus of most of their efforts? It doesn’t look that way. Can Google’s solitary cash cow really be getting too little focus from the Mountain View Mafia?

The Caffeine Algo promises significantly fresher results as well as an adapted architecture etc etc – but it’s primary focus has to be on maintaining revenue momentum when the vast majority of effort seems to be focused elsewhere. More than ever, Google has to defend its position in search, not only is Microsoft is about to land its much vaunted Yahoo! partnership providing the first real chance of competing with Google, but there is the problem of a wholesale shift away from Web Search as the primary navigation tool in favour of Social tools such as Facebook and Twitter.

The cracks are already showing, Google’s Q1 Revenues were $6.77bn, up 23% from last year of which 96% relates to search. Clearly Google’s revenues will be hard to improve on through share gain, given their already dominant position, leaving only the increase in Internet Population, Searches per User and Revenue per Search as the growth levers. Google’s numbers show only a 7% YoY uplift in Cost per Click and a 15% YoY uplift in Paid Clicks, so that leaves only the Growth in Internet Population and the number of searches conducted by each to fuel growth – each under threat for the reasons listed above.

Taking a very long  term perspective, Apple and Microsoft were incorporated 25 and 35 years ago respectively, it looks like Google’s Cash Cow will dry up long before they find an alternative source of revenues and never at the yields offered by Search. The fan boys won’t be pleased.

Android Phone beats iPhone, industry wins.

Ok, so I shouldn’t be ecstatic, but iPhone (at 21% share) being dethroned to 3rd spot behind Blackberry (36%) and Android (28%) in the US (Q1) means three things:

  • Switching cost is lower than originally thought

Given Apple’s mastery of the iPhone Ap Store, and the resulting average investment made by each user there was an incorrect assumption that iPhone customers would be highly resistant to switching platforms and losing access to their aps, not so.

  • OEM strategy still makes a ton of sense

Google have done an amazing job with the Android OS, moreover the Open Alliance is little different to Microsoft’s own approach to partnering with OEMs, great reinforcement of the potential of Windows Phone 7

  • iPhone is not infallible

Apple’s ascent has seemed unstoppable in the recent months, with Apple TV ranking as their principal failure, but Blackberry’s continued dominance of Business Mobility and Android’s performance in Consumer have served to remind us of the fragility of the market, something Apple could easily have forgotten.

Still, the iPhone 4G is just around the corner so the Wizards of Cupertino will rise again very soon; happy to enjoy the moment though!

Roll on Windows Phone 7, the fight is absolutely on.